Re Donald Popular Books

Re Donald Biography & Facts

Donald Trump's eligibility to run in the 2024 U.S. presidential election was the subject of dispute due to his involvement in the January 6 United States Capitol attack, through the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution's "insurrection clause", which disqualifies insurrectionists against the United States from holding office if they have previously taken an oath to support the constitution. Courts or officials in three states—Colorado, Maine, and Illinois—ruled that Trump was barred from presidential ballots. However, the Supreme Court in Trump v. Anderson (2024) reversed the ruling in Colorado on the basis that states could not enforce the insurrection clause against federal elected officials. In December 2023, the Colorado Supreme Court in Anderson v. Griswold ruled that Trump had engaged in insurrection and was ineligible to hold the office of President, and ordered that he be removed from the state's primary election ballots as a result. Later that same month, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows also ruled that Trump engaged in insurrection and was therefore ineligible to be on the state's primary election ballot. An Illinois judge ruled Trump was ineligible for ballot access in the state in February 2024. All three states had their decisions unanimously reversed by the United States Supreme Court. Previously, the Minnesota Supreme Court and the Michigan Court of Appeals both ruled that presidential eligibility cannot be applied by their state courts to primary elections, but did not rule on the issues for a general election. By January 2024, formal challenges to Trump's eligibility had been filed in at least 34 states. On January 5, 2024, the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari for Trump's appeal of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling in Anderson v. Griswold and heard oral arguments on February 8. On March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a ruling unanimously reversing the Colorado Supreme Court decision, ruling that states had no authority to remove Trump from their ballots. Several commentators have also argued for disqualification because of democratic backsliding, as well as the paradox of tolerance, arguing that voters should not be able to elect Donald Trump, whom they see as a threat to the republic. Other commentators argue that removing Trump from the ballot constitutes democratic backsliding. There has been widespread doxing, swatting, bomb scares, and other violent threats made against politicians who have attempted to remove Trump from the ballot. On December 29, 2023, Secretary Bellows was swatted. The incidents are part of a broader spate of swatting attacks. Background In the aftermath of the American Civil War, the 14th Amendment was enacted. Section 3 of the amendment prohibits anyone from holding public office if they had previously sworn an oath to support the Constitution, but then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the [United States], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." The full text of this section reads: Trump's role in the January 6 United States Capitol attack is cited by opponents as a reason for his disqualification from seeking public office. A state may also make a determination that Trump is disqualified under Section 3 from appearing on that state's ballot. Trump could appeal in court any disqualification by Congress or by a state. In addition to state or federal legislative action, a court action could be brought against Trump seeking his disqualification under Section 3. The 14th Amendment itself provides a path for Congress to allow such a candidate to run, but this would require a vote of two-thirds of each House to remove such disability. Second Trump impeachment On January 10, 2021, Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, formally requested Representatives' input as to whether to pursue Section 3 disqualification of outgoing President Donald Trump because of his role in the January 6 Capitol attack. On January 13, 2021, a majority of the House of Representatives (232–197) voted to impeach Trump for "incitement of insurrection". In the Senate impeachment trial, a majority of the Senate (57–43) voted on February 13, 2021, that he was guilty, but this fell short of the two-thirds supermajority required to convict him. Subsequent congressional action On July 1, 2021, the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol was formed. Over a year and a half, the committee interviewed more than a thousand people, reviewed more than a million documents, and held public hearings. On August 5, 2021, in a bill passed by the 117th United States Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden that awarded four Congressional Gold Medals to the United States Capitol Police, the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, and two U.S. Capitol Police officers who protected the United States Capitol during the January 6 attack, a finding listed in its first section declared that "On January 6, 2021, a mob of insurrectionists forced its way into the U.S. Capitol building and congressional office buildings and engaged in acts of vandalism, looting, and violently attacked Capitol Police officers." The bill passed overwhelmingly, including the support of 188 House Republicans, with only 21 voting against. On December 15, 2022, House Democrats introduced a bill finding that Trump was ineligible to hold the office of the Presidency under Section 3, but it did not advance. On December 22, the House Select January 6 Committee published an 845-page final report. The final report states that the 17 central findings of the Committee were as follows: Beginning election night and continuing through January 6 and thereafter, Donald Trump purposely disseminated false allegations of fraud related to the 2020 Presidential election in order to aid his effort to overturn the election and for purposes of soliciting contributions. These false claims provoked his supporters to violence on January 6. Knowing that he and his supporters had lost dozens of election lawsuits, and despite his own senior advisors refuting his election fraud claims and urging him to concede his election loss, Donald Trump refused to accept the lawful result of the 2020 election. Rather than honor his constitutional obligation [under Article II, Section III] to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," President Trump instead plotted to overturn the election outcome. Despite knowing that such an action would be illegal, and that no State had or would submit an altered electoral slate, Donald Trump corruptly pressured Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to count electoral votes during Congress's joint session on January 6. Donald Trump sought to corrupt the U.S. Department of Justice by attempting to enlist Department officials to make purposely false statements and thereby aid his effort to overturn the Presidential election. After that effort failed, Donald Trump offere.... Discover the Re Donald popular books. Find the top 100 most popular Re Donald books.

Best Seller Re Donald Books of 2024

  • In re Marriage of Donald Edward Hinkston synopsis, comments

    In re Marriage of Donald Edward Hinkston

    Arizona Court of Appeals

    In this appeal involving a dissolution proceeding, we are asked to determine if the lower court abused its discretion concerning the amount of spousal maintenance awarded to appell...

  • In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust of Donald C. Enderle synopsis, comments

    In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust of Donald C. Enderle

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina No. 9210SC629

    GREENE, Judge Donald C. Enderle and Jean Watkins Poole Enderle (the Enderles) appeal from the trial court's order affirming the decision of the clerk of court authorizing foreclosu...

  • In Re Disbarment Of Donald A. Rothrock synopsis, comments

    In Re Disbarment Of Donald A. Rothrock

    Supreme Court Of California In Bank

    THE COURT. On November 22, 1939, a certified copy of the record of the conviction of Donald A. Rothrock, an attorney at law, on a charge of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code,...

  • In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Donald R. Smith synopsis, comments

    In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Donald R. Smith

    Supreme Court of Washington

    The respondent, Donald R. Smith, was admitted to the practice of law in the state of Washington on February 20, 1964. Since that date he has continuously resided in the state and, ...

  • In Re Detention Of Roycroft Patterson. Donald F. Allison synopsis, comments

    In Re Detention Of Roycroft Patterson. Donald F. Allison

    Supreme Court of Washington

    This case involves the constitutionality of RCW 71.05.280(3) and .290(3), sections of the civil commitment statute which allow involuntary commitment for 90 days of persons found i...

  • In Re Complaint As To Conduct of Donald Dickerson synopsis, comments

    In Re Complaint As To Conduct of Donald Dickerson

    South Carolina Supreme Court

    This is a de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536; Bar Rules of Procedure (BRs) 10.1 and 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) filed a formal complaint against...

  • In Re Estate of Donald M. Mcendaffer synopsis, comments

    In Re Estate of Donald M. Mcendaffer

    Colorado Court of Appeals

    On June 4, 1974, Evert Owen Litsey, the petitioner herein, was convicted of a class 4 felony which carried a maximum penalty of 10 years in the State of Penitentiary. An habitual c...

  • In Re Welfare of Donald Frederick Adams synopsis, comments

    In Re Welfare of Donald Frederick Adams

    Division Two Court of Appeals of Washington

    Defendant appeals from an order of the juvenile court finding that he has violated the provisions of RCW 9A.88.100. We affirm.

  • In Re Marriage of Patricia G. and Donald D. Paul. Patricia G. Paul synopsis, comments

    In Re Marriage of Patricia G. and Donald D. Paul. Patricia G. Paul

    Second Appellate District, Division Three Court of Appeal of California

    In this case, we consider various questions arising out of a trustees petition for instructions as to the administration of a testamentary trust.

  • In Re Estate of Donald M. Mcendaffer synopsis, comments

    In Re Estate of Donald M. Mcendaffer

    Colorado Supreme Court

    Petitioner, Ludmilla McEndaffer, administratrix of the estate of her late husband, Donald M. McEndaffer, sought review of the decision of the court of appeals in In re Estate McEnd...

  • In Re Application Of Donald A. Rothrock For Writs Of Audita Querela And Coram Nobis synopsis, comments

    In Re Application Of Donald A. Rothrock For Writs Of Audita Querela And Coram Nobis

    Supreme Court Of California In Bank

    THE COURT. By this consolidated proceeding, the applicant, Donald A. Rothrock, has moved  and petitioned this court for writ of coram nobis, writ of audita querela, writ of ha...

  • Follow the Money synopsis, comments

    Follow the Money

    Dan Bongino

    As seen on The Ben Shapiro Show!Follow the Money exposes the labyrinth of connections between D.C.’s slimiest swamp creaturesDemocrat operatives, lying informants, desperate a...

  • How Muslims Shaped the Americas synopsis, comments

    How Muslims Shaped the Americas

    Omar Mouallem

    Winner of the Wilfrid Eggleston Award for NonfictionSelected as a Most Anticipated Book of Fall by The Globe and Mail and The Toronto StarAn insightful and perspectiveshifting new ...

  • How to Start a Revolution synopsis, comments

    How to Start a Revolution

    Lauren Duca

    Teen Vogue awardwinning columnist Lauren Duca shares a “fun, pithy, and intelligent” (Booklist) guide for challenging the status quo in a muchneeded reminder that young people are ...

  • Cut It Out synopsis, comments

    Cut It Out

    Bryan 'The Brush' Burnsides

    What do all despots and dictators across the ages have in common? Homicidal tendencies? Ruthless megalomania? A desire to enslave millions? Of course! But that isn't the whole st...

  • In Re Estate of Donald E. Geer synopsis, comments

    In Re Estate of Donald E. Geer

    Supreme Court of Wyoming

    Donald Bruce Geer (Bruce Geer), personal representative of the decedent, Donald E. Geers separate estate, appeals a judgment in favor of Joanne C. Geer as personal representative o...

  • The Misadventures of Awkward Black Girl synopsis, comments

    The Misadventures of Awkward Black Girl

    Issa Rae

    The “brilliantly wry” (Lena Dunham) and “lovably awkward” (Mindy Kaling) New York Times bestseller from the creator of HBO’s Insecure. In this universally accessible New York Times...