Reseña de The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution

The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution de Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin Resumen del Libro

This was the earliest form of socialism. It was developed by aristocrats who were opposed to the social changes brought about by the expanding bourgeoisie. Rather than focusing on their own plight, though, they trumpeted the concerns of working classes. Marx repudiates these feudal socialists for ignoring the fact that they were exploiters too when they were in power. Most importantly, though, they had no appreciation of historical progress. They did not understand that the bourgeoisie were their own offspring as the proletariat are the offspring of the bourgeoisie. Their primary concern was in reinstating the old feudal order, and they thus objected to both the bourgeoisie and proletariat insofar as each threatened to destroy previous social systems. Marx also identifies feudal socialism with Christian socialism, remarking that "Christian socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat".

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution (Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution, libro de Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution de Petr Alekseevich Kropotkin? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre The Place of Anarchism in Socialistic Evolution!