Reseña de Hartsfield V. Vidor

Hartsfield V. Vidor de Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Resumen del Libro

Pro se plaintiff, Napoleon Hartsfield, is an inmate at Ionia corrections facility in Michigan. On May 2 and 3, 1996, Plaintiff was placed on top-of-bed restraints for eighteen hours after he damaged his cell. He alleges that he was not allowed to eat, have fresh water or access to the toilet during that time. On July 19, 1996, plaintiff brought an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging (1) that defendants Vidor and Mowatt violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment when they placed him in top-of-bed restraints without a hearing; (2) that defendants Vidor and Mowatt violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because they intentionally discriminated against him by putting him in hard restraints while a white inmate who had damaged his cell was placed in soft restraints and (3) that the actions of all five defendants in denying him access to the toilet and fresh water for eighteen hours constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff also brought state claims of assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. Plaintiff moved to amend his complaint on September 9, 1996, to add two defendants and then filed a motion to "supplement" his complaint on October 28, 1996, to add an additional defendant and more claims.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Hartsfield V. Vidor? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Hartsfield V. Vidor (Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Hartsfield V. Vidor, libro de Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Hartsfield V. Vidor de Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Hartsfield V. Vidor!