Reseña de Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska

Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska de Court of Appeals of New York Resumen del Libro

The second session of the 89th Legislature enacted 1986 Neb. Laws, L.B. 911, codified in Neb. Rev. Stat. 53-101.03, 53-103, 53-117.03, 53-117.04, 53-131, 53-132, 53-133, 53-134, 53-134.01, and 53-1,116 (Cum. Supp. 1986), which undertakes a number of substantive and procedural changes in the regulation and control of the retail sale of alcoholic liquors under the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. 53-101 et seq. (Reissue 1984 & Supp. 1985). Principal among the substantive changes and central to the purpose of the subject enactment is the grant to local governing bodies of the option to make recommendations concerning approval or denial of alcoholic beverage licenses, which recommendations are binding upon the defendant-appellee Nebraska Liquor Control Commission. L.B. 911, 1, 3, and 4; 53-101.03 and 53-131 (Cum. Supp. 1986). Prior law gave local governing bodies the option of making nonbinding recommendations to the commission. 53-131 (Reissue 1984). Plaintiffs-appellants, Bosselman, Inc., Rite-Way Oil & Gas Company, Inc., Gas N Shop, Inc., Kwik Shop, Inc., Contemporary Industries Nebraska, Inc., and Wymodak, Inc., all holders of at least one liquor license subject to yearly renewal, seek a declaration that, among other things, empowering the local governing bodies to make binding recommendations constitutes a delegation of the States legislative power in violation of Neb. Const. art. II, 1, which, among other things, distributes the governmental powers of this state to three separate departments: legislative, executive, and judicial. Defendants-appellees, State of Nebraska and its aforesaid commission, and intervenor-appellee, City of Lincoln, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "regulators," deny the license holders claim and further assert that this suit does not fall within the purview of the declaratory judgment statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-21,149 et seq. (Reissue 1985). The district court entertained but dismissed the suit, finding L.B. 911 constitutional. We agree the suit was properly brought, but conclude the enactment unconstitutionally delegates the States legislative power to local governing bodies. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the district court.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska (Court of Appeals of New York) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska, libro de Court of Appeals of New York

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska de Court of Appeals of New York? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Bosselman v. State Nebraska and Nebraska!