Reseña de Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan

Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan de Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Resumen del Libro

Initially, we note that the Supreme Court erroneously denied the defendants motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Barbara Partlow did not sustain a serious injury as defined in Insurance Law ? 5102(d), in reliance upon a line of decisions of the Appellate Division, Third Department, which would require the defendants to submit a physicians affidavit in order to prevail on the motion (see, e.g., LaFrenire v Capital Dist. Transp. Auth., 96 A.D.2d 664). We have expressly declined to follow this rule in cases such as the one at bar (see, Wright v Melendez, 140 A.D.2d 337; Popp v Kremer, 124 A.D.2d 720).

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan, libro de Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan de Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Barbara Partlow v. James J. Meehan!