Reseña de Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R.

Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R. de Supreme Court of Alaska Resumen del Libro

This is the third time the parties in this case have appeared before this court. The present issues on appeal concern the damages awarded J. R. Lewis. Specifically, appellant, Anchorage Asphalt, contends that the trial court erred in valuing Lewis damages as of the time of the third trial rather than the date of breach, that the award unjustly enriches Lewis because he failed properly to maintain the roads in question, and that the award of prejudgment interest computed on the 1979 valuation of damages constitutes a double recovery. We reject the first two claims of error and accept the third.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R.? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R. (Supreme Court of Alaska) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R., libro de Supreme Court of Alaska

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R. de Supreme Court of Alaska? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Anchorage Asphalt Paving Company v. J. R.!