Reseña de Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow

Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow de Supreme Court Of Idaho Resumen del Libro

Plaintiffs Linda Winfree and her daughter, Sally Cosgrove, sued defendant Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Merrell Dow), for birth defects suffered by Cosgrove, allegedly as a result of Winfrees ingestion of the "anti-morning sickness" drug, Bendectin, during her pregnancy. This is one of a series of Bendectin cases filed nationwide. Summary judgment was granted for defendant on Winfrees individual claims because the I.C. § 5-219(4) 2-year statute of limitations had run. The claims of infant Cosgrove, however, were not barred by the statute of limitations, and those claims continued to trial. The jury returned a unanimous special verdict for defendant Merrell Dow, finding that Bendectin was not the proximate cause of Cosgroves birth defects. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow (Supreme Court Of Idaho) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow, libro de Supreme Court Of Idaho

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow de Supreme Court Of Idaho? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Sally Cosgrove v. Merrell Dow!