Reseña de William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill

William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill de Court of Appeals of North Carolina Resumen del Libro

On July 16, 1989, while working on property owned by Mike Dill, William Baber slipped, fell, and was impaled on a steel reinforcing rod. William Baber and his wife, Mary Lou Baber brought this lawsuit against Mike Dill alleging negligence and damages resulting from personal injuries that William Baber sustained. At the close of the Babers case in chief, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Dill, principally on the conclusion that William Babers actions constituted primary assumption of the risk. Further, the trial court also determined Dill did not owe a duty to William Baber. The court of appeals reversed the trial courts judgment, finding a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether William Baber had primarily assumed the risk. On appeal to this court, Dill contends the court of appeals erred as a matter of law by concluding that primary assumption of the risk did not bar the Babers action against him. Without reaching the issue of whether William Babers conduct constitutes primary assumption of the risk, we reverse.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill (Court of Appeals of North Carolina) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill, libro de Court of Appeals of North Carolina

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill de Court of Appeals of North Carolina? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre William R. and Mary Lou Baber v. Mike Dill!