Reseña de State Missouri v. Charles Arnold

State Missouri v. Charles Arnold de Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc Resumen del Libro

On March 19, 1995, the Board of Police Commissioners for Kansas City terminated the employment of Officer Patrick Trusler for violating its policy that requires members of the Kansas City Police Department to be "residents" of Kansas City, Missouri. The Circuit Court affirmed the decision of the Board. Officer Trusler now appeals the decision to this Court. On appeal, Officer Trusler alleges that: (1) the Boards finding that he was not a "resident" of Kansas City is not supported by competent and substantial evidence; (2) the Police Departments residency requirement is void because it is not consistent with Section 84.570(1), RSMo 1994, which on its face only requires police officers to be residents of the city at the time they are first employed; and (3) the Boards decision is void because it did not have the power to rule on his appeal since all of its members were not present at the hearings on his termination.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro State Missouri v. Charles Arnold? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

State Missouri v. Charles Arnold (Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de State Missouri v. Charles Arnold, libro de Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro State Missouri v. Charles Arnold de Supreme Court of Missouri En Banc? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre State Missouri v. Charles Arnold!