Reseña de Cooper v. Rimmer

Cooper v. Rimmer de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Resumen del Libro

A judge of this Court called for en banc review of the February 8, 2004, three-judge panel order in this case. A majority of the non-recused judges has voted in favor of en banc review of petitioner Kevin Coopers application to file a second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). The statute does not allow a petition for rehearing of a denial of authorization to file a second or successive application, but we have sua sponte power to rehear such a denial en banc. Thompson v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 918, 922 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 965 (1998); In re Byrd, 269 F.3d 585 (6th Cir. 2001), cert. denied sub nom. Bagley v. Byrd, 534 U.S. 1109 (2002); Triestman v. United States, 124 F.3d 361 (2d Cir. 1997). Cooper is scheduled to be executed at 12:01 a.m. tomorrow morning.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Cooper v. Rimmer? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Cooper v. Rimmer (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Cooper v. Rimmer, libro de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Cooper v. Rimmer de United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Cooper v. Rimmer!