Reseña de State v. Priest

State v. Priest de Supreme Court of Kansas Resumen del Libro

The opinion of the court was delivered by Defendant Carol Priest, who had completed one DUI diversion program and pled nolo contendere to a second DUI charge, was sentenced as a first-time DUI offender because the record of the prior diversion agreement failed to show that she had been advised of her right to legal counsel or that she had given a valid waiver of that right. The State appeals the sentencing pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3). On October 19, 1983, the defendant, Carol A. Priest, entered a diversion program with the City of Topeka in lieu of further criminal proceedings on a charge of driving under the influence. At that time, Priest did not have an attorney, and there is no indication in the record that she waived her right to an attorney when entering into the diversion agreement.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro State v. Priest? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

State v. Priest (Supreme Court of Kansas) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de State v. Priest, libro de Supreme Court of Kansas

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro State v. Priest de Supreme Court of Kansas? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre State v. Priest!