Reseña de Stephens v. Unified School District

Stephens v. Unified School District de Supreme Court of Kansas Resumen del Libro

The opinion of the court was delivered by This case arises under the Kansas act against discrimination, K.S.A. 44-1001 et seq. The issues presented are procedural, involving what is required to preserve for judicial review a claim made before the Kansas commission on civil rights, and what the scope of that review should be when it is made. In 1970 Clarence Stephens was employed by the appellee Unified School District No. 500 as a tenured teacher, and the school's only black teacher, in Central Junior High School in Kansas City. Central's student body was largely white. That summer he married Carolyn Sue Fuller, a white woman who was also a tenured teacher at Central. Upon learning of the marriage when school was about to start in August, Central's principal immediately expressed concern over the problems it would create. He informed Stephens that an unwritten policy of the school district precluded married employees from working in the same school, and that he would have to transfer to another school. After a conference the next day with an assistant superintendent of schools, Stephens was transferred to Northeast Junior High School. There the faculty was predominantly black, and the student body was entirely black. He replaced a white teacher who was transferred to Stephens' old position at Central. There were at that time two married couples teaching at Northeast, and they were permitted to continue to teach there [218 Kan. 222]

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Stephens v. Unified School District? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Stephens v. Unified School District (Supreme Court of Kansas) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Stephens v. Unified School District, libro de Supreme Court of Kansas

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Stephens v. Unified School District de Supreme Court of Kansas? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Stephens v. Unified School District!