Reseña de United States v. Floyd

United States v. Floyd de United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Resumen del Libro

This diversity suit for personal injuries is brought against Meade-Johnson Laboratories, Inc., the plaintiff claiming that the pharmaceutical company is liable for deformities of his Mongoloid twin daughters. The claim is that the companys oral contraceptive product, Oracon, used by the plaintiffs wife, caused the Mongoloid condition and that the company is liable under principles of strict liability in tort, negligence and breach of express and implied warranties. The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim for relief. 336 F. Supp. 961. Due to the favorable consideration which must be given a complaint on the motion, and principles of Oklahoma law on such bases of recovery, we are unable to agree with the district court.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro United States v. Floyd? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

United States v. Floyd (United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de United States v. Floyd, libro de United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro United States v. Floyd de United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre United States v. Floyd!