Reseña de Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al.

Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al. de Dallas Court of Civil Appeals of Texas Resumen del Libro

In their motion for rehearing appellants ask that we reconsider our action in striking the statement of facts from the record in this case. They point out that on August 5, 1957 they filed their motion for an extension of time to file the statement of facts. The motion was filed on the sixtieth day after the trial court had overruled appellants motion for new trial. A hearing on the motion for an extension of time was had on October 17, 1957, and on November 1, 1957 we granted a thirty-day extension. Appellants say, and we agree with them, that they are not to be blamed because we did not sooner act on their motion for an extension.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al.? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al. (Dallas Court of Civil Appeals of Texas) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al., libro de Dallas Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al. de Dallas Court of Civil Appeals of Texas? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Bernice Couch Et Vir v. City Richardson Et Al.!