Reseña de State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio Resumen del Libro

HOLMES, J. I.      Appellant, state of Ohio, argues that the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the convictions of defendants-appellees, Thomas and Gainer, for noncompliance with Crim. R. 23(B), which, in part, provides that [i]n misdemeanor cases juries shall consist of eight. Appellant urges this court to avoid a rigid and inflexible interpretation of Crim. R. 23(B), and argues that the rule must be read in light of the liberal joinder provisions of Crim. R. 8(B). In response, appellees assert that the language of Crim. R. 23(B) is mandatory in character. They also contend that the Court of Appeals correctly held that separate trials are required where an alleged misdemeanant is indicted jointly with an alleged felon.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro State v. Thomas? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

State v. Thomas (The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de State v. Thomas, libro de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro State v. Thomas de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre State v. Thomas!