Reseña de Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig

Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig de Court of Appeals of Wisconsin Resumen del Libro

Robert Newhouse, by his guardian ad litem, appeals a summary judgment dismissing his complaint against Citizens Security Mutual
Insurance Company for personal injuries he received when he became entangled in a silo unloader. The issue is whether an exclusionary
clause contained in a homeowner's policy precludes coverage for the accident. We conclude that the exclusionary clause is
inapplicable and reverse. In considering motions for summary judgment, we must first examine the pleadings and affidavits to determine whether any
factual dispute exists or if conflicting inferences might be drawn from the undisputed facts. Lawver v. Boling, 71 Wis. 2d
408, 413, 238 N.W.2d 514, 517 (1976). Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no dispute of material fact and the law
resolving the issues is clear. Tomlin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Liab. Ins. Co., 95 Wis. 2d 215, 218, 290 N.W.2d 285, 287 (1980).

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig, libro de Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig de Court of Appeals of Wisconsin? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Robert C. Newhouse v. Laidig!