Reseña de Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company de Second District Court of Appeal of Florida Resumen del Libro

KANNER, Judge. Appellant sought to recover damages from the appellees, predicating his right to recovery upon an alleged oral agreement
for issuance of an automobile liability insurance policy by the appellee insurance company to Harold J. Chastain, a minor.
The action thus brought is one at law. A motion for summary judgment filed by the appellees was granted by the trial judge.
The pertinent part of his order reads, "It is ordered and adjudged that defendant's motion, filed February 25, 1959, for summary
judgment, is granted." The appeal is from this order.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Second District Court of Appeal of Florida) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, libro de Second District Court of Appeal of Florida

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company de Second District Court of Appeal of Florida? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Holland H. Chastain v. Floyd R. Embry and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company!