Reseña de Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School

Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School de Court of Appeals of Michigan Resumen del Libro

Plaintiffs, six school teachers and one social worker employed by defendant school district, appeal as of right from a January
24, 1990, opinion and order of the Ingham Circuit Court granting summary Disposition to defendants, East Lansing School District,
East Lansing Education Association, and Jean Cusick. Plaintiffs' complaint seeks to avoid a January 28, 1988, arbitrator's
opinion and award affecting salary levels paid pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between defendants district and
association. Plaintiffs were hired by defendant district between 1983 and 1986 and each plaintiff was given one hundred percent credit
for previous teaching experience. Each employment contract was made subject to the 1983-1986 collective bargaining agreement,
which contained a step-scale salary schedule. Article XXVI(B) of that agreement expressly provided that new hires would receive
one-half credit for all prior teaching experience. Article XXVI(D) provided that "all teachers shall be compensated in accordance
with Article XXVI without deviation." Article XIX(B) prescribed a grievance procedure culminating at level four:

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School (Court of Appeals of Michigan) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School, libro de Court of Appeals of Michigan

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School de Court of Appeals of Michigan? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Cheryl Martin v. East Lansing School!