Reseña de People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis

People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis de Court of Appeals of New York Resumen del Libro

[29 N.Y.2d 923 Page 924] Reaching the issue, left open by our decision in People v. Nuernberger (25 N.Y.2d 179, 182), whether incest is an act within
the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Family Court conferred by sections 812 and 813 of the Family Court Act, we conclude
that it is not. Neither the original enactment of section 812 specifying disorderly conduct and assault nor its subsequent
amendment to include acts which would constitute harassment, menacing, reckless endangerment and attempted assault (L. 1969,
ch. 736), purport to include incest, which, thus, under the familiar rule of construction, will be deemed excluded (McKinney's
Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 1, Statutes, § 240). Neither do we find that act within its intendment (see People v. Fuentes, 51
Misc. 2d 354, 357; People ex rel. Doty v. Krueger, 58 Misc. 2d 428, affd. 32 A.D.2d 845, app. dsmd. 26 N.Y.2d 881).

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis (Court of Appeals of New York) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis, libro de Court of Appeals of New York

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis de Court of Appeals of New York? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre People State New York v. Carlton Earl Lewis!