Reseña de Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas

Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas de Court of Appeals of Michigan Resumen del Libro

In this breach of contract action, plaintiff appeals the trial court's grant of summary Disposition to defendant McDonnell
Douglas Capital Corporation (mdcc) pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (statute of frauds) and 2.116(C)(10). We affirm. Plaintiff was employed as a salesman at Burroughs Corporation in Mexico in 1986 when he learned of an opening at First National
Capital (fnc). In 1987, he met with an agent of fnc, Thomas Husband, and discussed the possibilities of employment and fnc's
opening of a branch office in Puerto Rico. Plaintiff resigned from Burroughs, moved to Michigan, and began working for fnc
in April 1987. Plaintiff's family, which had been living in Mexico, relocated to Puerto Rico, where plaintiff's mother-in-law
lived. (This move was made at Burroughs' expense by prearrangement with plaintiff.) In September 1987, believing that the
compensation was not what he had been promised, plaintiff met with Husband, who outlined a three-year compensation plan and
suggested that plaintiff move his family to Michigan. No written record of this meeting or the compensation arrangements was
ever made. Plaintiff's family joined him in Michigan in December 1987.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas (Court of Appeals of Michigan) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas, libro de Court of Appeals of Michigan

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas de Court of Appeals of Michigan? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Manuel E. Marrero v. Mcdonnell Douglas!