Reseña de Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine

Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine de Supreme Court of Alabama Resumen del Libro

PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Peter G. T. Balogun, Sr., petitioned for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals, which had 1) denied
a writ of mandamus directed to the Honorable Dale Segrest, Circuit Court, Macon County, Alabama, compelling him to recuse
himself and 2) affirmed the trial court decision permitting Tuskegee Newspaper, Inc., and Paul R. Davis to intervene in petitioner's
divorce proceeding to obtain certain documents pursuant to a claimed First Amendment right. We reverse the judgment of the
Court of Civil Appeals affirming Judge Segrest's refusal to recuse himself and affirming Judge Segrest's order allowing the
intervention of Tuskegee Newspaper, Inc., and Paul R. Davis; we remand to the Court of Civil Appeals with instructions for
that court to grant the writ of mandamus compelling recusal and to remand to the circuit court for proceedings consistent
with this opinion.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine (Supreme Court of Alabama) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine, libro de Supreme Court of Alabama

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine de Supreme Court of Alabama? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Ex Parte Peter G. T. Balogun v. Catherine!