Reseña de State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections

State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio Resumen del Libro

Per Curiam. In his first proposition of law, appellant argues that his complaint stated claims in mandamus and that the court of appeals
erred in dismissing them sua sponte. In his second, he contends that the board disregarded applicable law and abused its discretion
by relying on Judge Spencer's report to reject appellant's nomination papers. It may well be that appellant was wrongly denied
a place on the May 1988 primary ballot and that the court of appeals erred by dismissing his action summarily. However, because
his appeal was not properly perfected, this court has no jurisdiction to consider these issues.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections (The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, libro de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections de The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre State, Ex Rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections!