Reseña de Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida

Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida de First District Court of Appeal of Florida Resumen del Libro

Gust appeals from the summary denial of his motion pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. We reverse. Gust was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon and battery after pleading nolo contendere. No appeal was taken. He later
filed a motion pursuant to Rule 3.850 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that his plea was coerced. The trial
court summarily denied the motion and this court reversed and remanded for attachment of those portions of the record conclusively
showing Gust was entitled to no relief. See Gust v. State, 504 So.2d 61 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). According to appellee State,
the trial court on remand again denied the motion, with supporting attachments; Gust did not appeal.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida (First District Court of Appeal of Florida) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida, libro de First District Court of Appeal of Florida

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida de First District Court of Appeal of Florida? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Stephen Daniel Gust v. State Florida!