Reseña de Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher

Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher de Supreme Court of South Dakota Resumen del Libro

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice. This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident in Rapid City. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial on the grounds the $10,000 verdict was inadequate. We affirm. In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying an application for a new trial, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. Hanisch v. Body, 77 S.D. 265, 90 N.W.2d 924 (1958). The verdict, although in plaintiff's favor, was for less than she had claimed.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher (Supreme Court of South Dakota) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher, libro de Supreme Court of South Dakota

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher de Supreme Court of South Dakota? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Marcella M. Stoltz v. Russell Stonecypher!