Reseña de People State New York v. Jose Santiago

People State New York v. Jose Santiago de Court of Appeals of New York Resumen del Libro

On the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial courts failure to grant defendants motions for a mistrial was error. Any prejudice to the defendant which might have arisen due to the brief mention of uncharged criminal activity which was made at defendants trial was alleviated when the court sustained defendants objections and took prompt curative action. Hence, defendants motions for a mistrial were properly denied. Moreover, if defendant was of the view that the curative instructions which were given were insufficient, he should have immediately made an application seeking further or more complete instructions. In the absence of such an application, he may not assert the inadequacy of such instructions as error on appeal.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro People State New York v. Jose Santiago? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

People State New York v. Jose Santiago (Court of Appeals of New York) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de People State New York v. Jose Santiago, libro de Court of Appeals of New York

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro People State New York v. Jose Santiago de Court of Appeals of New York? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre People State New York v. Jose Santiago!