Reseña de Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster

Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster de Court of Appeals of New York Resumen del Libro

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to respondents against both appellants, for the reasons stated in its memorandum (98 A.D.2d 869). We add that, whether or not petitioner has standing to bring the instant proceeding in light of the provisions of article IV of the collective bargaining agreement (Chupka v Lorenz-Schneider Co., 12 N.Y.2d 1; Matter of Soto [ Goldman ], 7 N.Y.2d 397), the issues raised are properly before us on the countys appeal, it having cross-petitioned for the same relief. We note further, however, that the claim of laches is not, that question being for the arbitrator (cf. CPLR 7502, subd [b]), and that revocation of the Apuzzo appointment is not barred by section 75 of the Civil Service Law, the failure to follow the seniority preference provision of section 2 of article XIV of the agreement being an irregularity of a substantial nature in the appointment, within the meaning of the last unnumbered paragraph of subdivision 4 of section 50 of the Civil Service Law (see, also, Civil Service Law, § 52, subd 2).

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster (Court of Appeals of New York) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster, libro de Court of Appeals of New York

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster de Court of Appeals of New York? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Matter Patricia Apuzzo v. County Ulster!