Reseña de Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art

Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art de United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Resumen del Libro

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Lillie Benally and Grant Benally, on behalf of Norman Benally, appeal the district court's dismissal, for lack of personal jurisdiction, of their invasion of privacy claims against defendant Amon Carter Museum of Western Art (the Museum). The district court's decision is reported as Benally v. Hundred Arrows Press, Inc., 614 F. Supp. 969 (D.N.M. 1985). The issues on appeal are (1) whether the New Mexico long-arm statute, N.M. Stat. Ann. § 38-1-16, permits the exercise of diversity jurisdiction over the Museum, and if so, (2) whether the exercise of jurisdiction in New Mexico over the Museum would offend the ""traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice"" embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art (United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art, libro de United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art de United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Benally v. Amon Carter Museum of Western Art!