Reseña de Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot

Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot de Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Resumen del Libro

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing appellant's (Willis) petition against respondent Brot with prejudice for failure to answer interrogatories. 1 The interrogatories in question inquired into the working relationship between one of appellant's doctors and appellant's attorneys in personal injury suits in which appellant was not a party. Appellant filed her petition against several defendants, including respondent for damages for personal injuries arising out of a multicar collision. During the course of discovery, respondent directed two sets of interrogatories to appellant. The first set was of a conventional nature and was timely answered by appellant. In the answers to the first set of interrogatories, appellant disclosed that Dr. Nasrallah, a chiropractor, had treated her for injuries arising out of the automobile accident and that he would be called as an expert witness at trial. In his second set of interrogatories to appellant, respondent asked the following questions:

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot (Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot, libro de Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot de Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Valerie Willis v. Frederick Brot!