Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas Book Reviews

Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas by Third District, Austin Court of Appeals of Texas Book Summary

Appellant contends that: (1) a psychiatrist was erroneously permitted to testify to statements made by appellant during a competency examination; (2) the prosecutor improperly referred to the order of the trial court finding that appellants confession was voluntary; (3) testimony concerning an unrelated crime was erroneously introduced; (4) the prosecutor offered in evidence photographs which had previously been ruled inadmissible; (5) evidence as to appellants lack of a prior criminal record was erroneously excluded; (6) the trial court erroneously refused appellants requested charges on assault and on the presumption of innocence; (7) the trial court erroneously charged the jury on the offense of injury to a child; (8) the prosecutor engaged in improper jury argument; (9) the district attorney should have been required to honor a pretrial plea bargain agreement; and (10) the State should not have been allowed to have two attorneys present its case.

👋 Do you love Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas books? Please share your friends!

Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas (Third District, Austin Court of Appeals of Texas) Book Reviews 2024

Third District, Austin Court of Appeals of Texas - Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas by Third District, Austin Court of Appeals of Texas book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Joe Henry Derusse v. State Texas!