Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young Book Reviews

Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young by Houston the First Court of Civil Appeals Book Summary

This is an original mandamus proceeding precipitating out of a workmans compensation lawsuit filed by relator Thurmon A. Russell against Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Company. Relator Dr. James C. Sharp (hereinafter referred to as "relator") has examined and treated Russell and is apparently scheduled to testify during the trial as a medical expert for Russell. Under Rule 202, T.R.C.P., Hardware Insurance Company filed a notice and request to take the deposition of relator, together with a subpoena duces tecum requiring him to produce certain medical, accounting and financial records. The subpoena, dated December 17, 1969, was in regard to relators possible bias and prejudice. Thereafter, relator filed a Motion to Quash the subpoena duces tecum. Following a hearing, Honorable Horace S. Young, Judge of the 117th Judicial District (hereinafter referred to as "respondent") sustained relators Motion to Quash as to some of the items listed in the subpoena duces tecum and overruled the Motion to Quash as to the other items, with certain limitations. As a result of respondents order of January 13, 1970, relator must appear before the 117th District Court for the taking of his deposition and the production of the following items:

👋 Do you love Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young books? Please share your friends!

Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young (Houston the First Court of Civil Appeals) Book Reviews 2024

Houston the First Court of Civil Appeals - Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young by Houston the First Court of Civil Appeals book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Thurmon A. Russell Et Al. v. Horace Young!