fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al Book Reviews

fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al by The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Book Summary

On June 21, 1949, respondent, Tom E. Haygood, an employee of S.P. Braud Conveyor Service, was injured while installing in the plant of the Imperial Sugar Company certain machinery which the Conveyor Service had contracted with the Sugar Company to install. Haygood was paid $7139 as compensation for his injuries by petitioner, Fort Worth Lloyds, the compensation carrier of Conveyor Service under the Workmens Compensation statute. Thereafter, Haygood filed a suit against the Sugar Company, as a third party tort-feasor, and Fort Worth Lloyds intervened and sought recovery of the amount of compensation paid by it to Haygood, and for expenses and attorneys fees. Efforts were made by the Sugar Company to settle this suit with Haygood and Fort Worth Lloyds, but no agreement was reached. Sugar Company and Haygood contend that no settlement was reached because of the illegal and unjust demands made by Fort Worth Lloyds as to the amount of expenses and attorneys fees claimed. On date of trial, Sugar Company and Haygood announced in open court that they had entered into an agreement whereby Haygood, for a consideration of $12500 cash, plus an additional $100 to be paid to Haygood, in the event of an ultimate recovery of a judgment against Sugar Company in the then pending suit in excess of $12500, had assigned "all rights to levy

👋 Do you love fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al books? Please share your friends!

fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al (The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals) Book Reviews 2024

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals - fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al by The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about fort Worth Lloyds v. Tom E. Haygood Et Al!