Peterson v. Basf Corporation Book Reviews

Peterson v. Basf Corporation by Supreme Court of Montana Book Summary

In February 2004, we affirmed the judgment for respondents Ronald Peterson, et al., in this class action against appellant BASF Corporation for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act ("NJCFA"), N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 56.8-1 to -106 (West 2001), in BASFs marketing and advertising of its herbicides Poast and Poast Plus. Peterson v. BASF Corp., 675 N.W.2d 57 (Minn. 2004) ("Peterson III"). BASF petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. In an order filed May 2, 2005, the Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431, 125 S.Ct. 1788 (2005), a recently-decided case on preemption under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ("FIFRA"), 7 U.S.C. §§ 136-136y (2000). BASF Corp. v. Peterson, 125 S.Ct. 1968 (Mem.) (2005). Bates confirms our earlier conclusion that the respondents claims are not preempted by FIFRA, and we therefore affirm the court of appeals.

👋 Do you love Peterson v. Basf Corporation books? Please share your friends!

Peterson v. Basf Corporation (Supreme Court of Montana) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Montana - Peterson v. Basf Corporation Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Peterson v. Basf Corporation by Supreme Court of Montana book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Peterson v. Basf Corporation!