Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami Book Reviews

Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami by Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida Book Summary

I respectfully dissent. I would grant the rehearing en banc and affirm the judgment on the jury verdict in favor of the University of Miami. The question of agency is normally a jury question. Cirou v. Basler, 432 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Bernstein v. Dwork, 320 So.2d 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Financial Fire & Casualty Company v. Southmost Vegetable Cooperative Association, 212 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). It was properly submitted to the jury under the issues as framed in the pleadings. Parsons v. Reyes, 238 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1970); Bruce Construction Corp., v. The State Exchange Bank, 102 So.2d 288 (Fla. 1958); Gravette v. Turner, 77 Fla. 311, 81 So. 476 (1919); Levey v. Getelman, 444 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Ranger v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 336 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In Parsons v. Reyes, supra, at page 563 the Supreme Court said:

👋 Do you love Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami books? Please share your friends!

Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami (Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida) Book Reviews 2024

Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida - Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami by Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Miguel Jaar and George Jaar v. University Miami!