Cooke v. Cooke Book Reviews

Cooke v. Cooke by Court of Appeals of North Carolina Book Summary

Defendants first, fifth, and sixth assignments of error are that the trial court erred in denying defendants motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on plaintiffs negligence claim. Defendant argues that its motion for directed verdict should have been granted because plaintiff did not present any evidence of negligence on the part of defendant. The question raised by defendants motion for directed verdict was whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and giving plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference, was insufficient to justify a verdict for plaintiff. Kelly v. International Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E.2d 396 (1971). The test for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is the same as for directed verdict. Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E.2d 897 (1974).

👋 Do you love Cooke v. Cooke books? Please share your friends!

Cooke v. Cooke (Court of Appeals of North Carolina) Book Reviews 2024

Court of Appeals of North Carolina - Cooke v. Cooke Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Cooke v. Cooke by Court of Appeals of North Carolina book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Cooke v. Cooke!