Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne Book Reviews

Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne by Court of Appeals of Indiana Book Summary

Appellant was convicted after jury trial of living in a house of ill fame.[Footnote 1] On appeal, this conviction was reversed because the record contained "... no direct evidence of appellants sex... ." Sumpter v. State, (1973) Ind. App., 296 N.E.2d 131, 133. We accepted the states petition to transfer the matter to this Court and modified the Indiana common law rule on proof of sex to provide that trial courts may take judicial notice of a defendants sex. Sumpter v. State, (1974) 261 Ind. 471, 306 N.E.2d 95. The effect of such notice is the creation of a rebuttable presumption sufficient to establish a prima facie case where the defendant "fails to produce any competent evidence to the contrary." Id., at 99. Upon review of the other questions presented by appellant, we affirmed the conviction but remanded the cause to the trial court "for determination of the defendants sex pursuant to the procedures set out herein." Id., at 104.

👋 Do you love Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne books? Please share your friends!

Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne (Court of Appeals of Indiana) Book Reviews 2024

Court of Appeals of Indiana - Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne by Court of Appeals of Indiana book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Joseph Clark Mccarthy v. Adele Marianne!