Callahan v. Gray Book Reviews

Callahan v. Gray by Supreme Court Of California Book Summary

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment, entered on a jury verdict, in her action to recover for alleged personal injuries resulting from an impact with defendants automobile when plaintiff was walking across Fair Oaks Avenue in South Pasadena, in a marked pedestrian crosswalk. She contends that the evidence as a matter of law is insufficient to support the verdict and ensuing judgment. Contrary to plaintiffs contention, the evidence amply sustains implied findings by the jury (1) that plaintiff negligently walked into the side of defendants automobile rather than being struck by it, and (2) that plaintiff was not injured by the occurrence. Since either of such findings would support a verdict for defendant, it follows that plaintiffs contention is untenable and, hence, that the judgment should be affirmed.

👋 Do you love Callahan v. Gray books? Please share your friends!

Callahan v. Gray (Supreme Court Of California) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court Of California - Callahan v. Gray Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Callahan v. Gray by Supreme Court Of California book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Callahan v. Gray!