James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois Book Reviews

James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois by Supreme Court of Florida Book Summary

Appellant seeks review of his conviction for armed robbery; and of his sentence, as an habitual violent felony offender, to forty years in prison. He raises four issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts; (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting out-of-court and in-court identifications; (3) whether the trial court erred in denying a motion for a judgment of acquittal as to that portion of the information which charged that the robbery had been committed with a "deadly weapon"; and (4) whether, because appellant had been convicted of a first degree felony punishable by a term of years not exceeding life, the trial court erred in sentencing appellant as an habitual violent felony offender. We find the first two grounds to be without merit, and affirm as to them, without discussion. We reverse and remand, with directions, as to the third ground, thereby rendering the fourth ground moot.

👋 Do you love James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois books? Please share your friends!

James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois (Supreme Court of Florida) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Florida - James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois by Supreme Court of Florida book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about James Gibson v. Garth Courtois and Sally Courtois!