Neal v. Marrone Book Reviews

Neal v. Marrone by Supreme Court of North Carolina Book Summary

A contract not required to be in writing may be partly written and partly oral. However, where the parties have deliberately put their engagements in writing in such terms as import a legal obligation free of uncertainty, it is presumed the writing was intended by the parties to represent all their engagements as to the elements dealt with in the writing. Accordingly, all prior and contemporaneous negotiations in respect to those elements are deemed merged in the written agreement. And the rule is that, in the absence of fraud or mistake or allegation thereof, parol testimony of prior or contemporaneous negotiations or conversations inconsistent with the writing, or which tend to substitute a new and different contract from the one evidenced by the writing, is incompetent. See Whitehurst v. FCX Fruit and Vegetable Service, 224 N.C. 628, 32 S.E.2d 34; Insurance Co. v. Morehead, 209 N.C. 174, 183 S.E. 606; Miller v. Farmers Federation, 192 N.C. 144, 134 S.E. 407; {PA}

👋 Do you love Neal v. Marrone books? Please share your friends!

Neal v. Marrone (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of North Carolina - Neal v. Marrone Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Neal v. Marrone by Supreme Court of North Carolina book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Neal v. Marrone!