Pressley v. Turner Book Reviews

Pressley v. Turner by Supreme Court of North Carolina Book Summary

By the express language of our statute, G.S. 1-105, the operation of a motor vehicle by a nonresident on the highways is the equivalent of the appointment of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles as process agent for the nonresident. Neither ownership nor physical presence in the motor vehicle is necessary for valid service. It is sufficient if the nonresident had the legal right to exercise control at the moment the asserted cause of action arose. Winborne v. Stokes, 238 N.C. 414, 78 S.E.2d 171; Davis v. Martini, 233 N.C. 351, 64 S.E.2d 1; Ewing v. thompson, 233 N.C. 564, 65 S.E.2d 17; Queen City Coach Co. v. Chattanooga Medicine Co., 220 N.C. 442, 17 S.E.2d 478; Wynn v., Robinson, 216 N.C. 347, 4 S.E.2d 884. The findings of fact suffice to sustain the service of process.

👋 Do you love Pressley v. Turner books? Please share your friends!

Pressley v. Turner (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of North Carolina - Pressley v. Turner Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Pressley v. Turner by Supreme Court of North Carolina book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Pressley v. Turner!