Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen Book Reviews

Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen by Court of Appeals of New York Book Summary

[7 N.Y.2d 376 Page 379] Alice Hammer, suffering from schizophrenia, was treated for some seven years by Dr. Rosen, a psychiatrist. In 1955 she and her father instituted this action, the patient seeking damages for malpractice, the father, for breach of contract and for fraud.1 Their efforts have been signally unsuccessful. The trial court dismissed the malpractice and fraud causes of action at the close of the plaintiffs' case, while the jury, following submission to it of the contract cause, returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, and the Appellate Division, by a divided court, affirmed the resulting judgment. Although we agree with the disposition made of the other counts, we believe, as did the dissenting justice in the Appellate Division, that the count charging malpractice should have been submitted to the jury.

👋 Do you love Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen books? Please share your friends!

Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen (Court of Appeals of New York) Book Reviews 2024

Court of Appeals of New York - Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen by Court of Appeals of New York book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Sidney Hammer Et Al. v. John N. Rosen!