Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers Book Reviews

Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers by Supreme Court of Nebraska Book Summary

Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska (Farmers) appeals a $16,636.70 jury verdict which determined that sheep owned
by Dale and Donna Brown were stolen and that the loss was, therefore, covered under the theft provisions of an insurance policy
issued to the Browns by Farmers. We affirm. Farmers' six assignments of error combine to allege that the trial court erred in (1) overruling Farmers' motion for a directed
verdict, (2) failing to give a requested instruction, (3) permitting two law enforcement officers to testify that a livestock
thief or thieves were operating in Dawes County, (4) permitting testimony of a decrease in wool subsidy payments and allowing
the jury to include such amount in its verdict when the policy covered only "direct loss to insured farm personal property,"
and (5) not applying the applicable $100 deductible to each theft proven. The fifth assignment of error is not discussed in
Farmers' brief. "Errors assigned but not discussed in an appellant's brief are not considered by this court. [Citations omitted.]"
Horst v. Johnson, 237 Neb. 155, 156, 465 N.W.2d 461, 462 (1991). We, therefore, will consider only the first four assignments
of error listed above.

👋 Do you love Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers books? Please share your friends!

Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers (Supreme Court of Nebraska) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Nebraska - Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers by Supreme Court of Nebraska book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Dale Brown and Donna Brown v. Farmers!