Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice Book Reviews

Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice by Supreme Court of Georgia Book Summary

Syllabus Opinion by the Court DUCKWORTH, Presiding Justice. 1. The petition, praying for a decree of title to described land, that deeds of the defendants to the said property be surrendered into court as clouds on the petitioner's title, that the defendants be enjoined from changing the status of the property, and for general relief, alleges that the defendant Jennings received from the City of Atlanta on September 26, 1945, a tax deed to the said property, 'a copy of which is attached hereto a Exhibit 'A,' but which is shown to be a quitclaim deed only; that by a warranty deed Jennings conveyed the property to the defendants, James and Lula Mae Cornelius, on October 2, 1945, a copy of which is attached to the petition as Exhibit 'B'; and that on November 19, 1945, the petitioner tendered to the defendant Jennings $41.87, being the amount of taxes paid by Jennings plus interest and the penalty allowed by law, and demanded that the property be reconveyed to the petitioner; but that Jennings refused and continues to refuse to reconvey to him. The allegations of the petition show no title in the petitioner to the land in question, and, accordingly, no right to any of the relief sought, and the court erred in overruling the general demurrer.

👋 Do you love Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice books? Please share your friends!

Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice (Supreme Court of Georgia) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Georgia - Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice by Supreme Court of Georgia book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Cornelius Et Al. v. Trice!