Winters v. Beck Book Reviews

Winters v. Beck by Supreme Court of Arkansas Book Summary

On the 13th day of May, 1965, petitioner, Robert Winters, was convicted in the Little Rock Municipal Court of immorality, a misdemeanor under the provisions of Little Rock Ordinance 25-121. His punishment was fixed at 30 days in jail and a fine of $254.00, which included the costs. He has filed a petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus, or alternatively for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis. He alleges that he is indigent and did not have benefit of counsel at his trial in the Municipal Court. He also states that be has sought conviction relief, to no avail, in both the Little Rock Municipal Court and in the Pulaski Circuit Court. In his petition here, petitioner alleges that his constitutional rights were violated because no lawyer was appointed to defend him on the misdemeanor charge in Little Rock Municipal Court. When his case was called for trial, he did not indicate that he wanted an attorney and he did not ask that the case be continued. We have held that no duty is imposed upon the trial court to appoint counsel for a defendant charged with a misdemeanor. Kirkwood v. State, 199 Ark. 879, 136 S.W.2d 174; Wimberly v. State. 214 Ark. 930, 218 S.W.2d 730.

👋 Do you love Winters v. Beck books? Please share your friends!

Winters v. Beck (Supreme Court of Arkansas) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Arkansas - Winters v. Beck Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Winters v. Beck by Supreme Court of Arkansas book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Winters v. Beck!