John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al. Book Reviews

John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al. by Supreme Court of New York Book Summary

Defendants appeal from the order of Special Term to the extent that the court conditioned dismissal of the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and vacatur of the attachment upon defendants agreeing to accept service of process in an action to be commenced in New Jersey and waiving Statute of Limitations as a defense, except to the extent available as a defense in this action. The suit was instituted upon an order attaching the contractual obligation of defendants insurer to defend and indemnify under a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by Continental Insurance Company. Special Term found that such attachment, procured on authority of Seider v Roth (17 N.Y.2d 111), was invalid in view of the recent United States Supreme Court opinion in Shaffer v Heitner (433 U.S. 186), which held applicable to all assertions of jurisdiction the minimum contacts test of International Shoe Co. v Washington (326 U.S. 310).

👋 Do you love John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al. books? Please share your friends!

John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al. (Supreme Court of New York) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of New York - John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al. Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al. by Supreme Court of New York book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about John J. Foley v. Mary E. Roche Et Al.!