Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc. Book Reviews

Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc. by Court of Appeals of North Carolina No. 8818SC1087 Book Summary

This appeal concerns the enforceability of a condominium declaration amendment which restricts the leasing of units in the Greensboro residential condominium complex known as Fountain Manor. The pertinent facts follow: Plaintiff owns four units in that complex. Defendant, a non-profit corporation, operates and manages the complex, which was established under Chapter 47A of the North Carolina General Statutes, the ""Unit Ownership Act."" When plaintiff's units were acquired -- the first in 1978, the last in April, 1985 -- the condominium declaration did not restrict the leasing of units, but did forbid their use by transients or for commercial purposes. For a year or so before June, 1986 plaintiff rented all her units to tenants for short periods of less than a year, sometimes for less than a month, and some rentals were to corporations; during that time one unit had twelve different sets of tenants, another one had seven, and another had six. The great majority of the Fountain Manor units are occupied by owners, most of whom are elderly and live with their spouses or alone, and some owners complained about plaintiff's short term lessees being too noisy, not maintaining the common spaces properly, and allowing pets to run loose. Through their efforts the condominium declaration was amended effective 24 June 1986 to forbid inter alia the leasing of units to corporations, to persons for less than a year, and subleasing. Plaintiff sued to have the amendments declared invalid and their enforcement enjoined; and defendant counterclaimed for plaintiff's failure to abide by them. Following the filing of cross-motions for summary judgment, along with supporting affidavits, depositions and other materials, the parties agreed that the material facts are not in dispute and that the only question presented, the validity of the amendments, is one of law. In resolving that question the trial judge ruled that the amended declaration is valid as to purchasers of units after their adoption, but is invalid as to plaintiff and other owners who bought their units before the amendment was adopted. The judgment is erroneous and we reverse it. The rights and duties of condominium unit owners under Chapter 47A of the North Carolina General Statutes are not the same as those of real property owners at common law. Recognizing the interest that all unit owners have in the operation of their mutually owned enterprise, the Chapter permits restrictions to be imposed by the declaration or recorded instrument which submits the property to the provisions of the Chapter and permits the unit owners to amend the declaration by following the procedures prescribed and makes the rules so adopted binding upon all owners involved. G.S. 47A-3(6) provides:

👋 Do you love Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc. books? Please share your friends!

Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc. (Court of Appeals of North Carolina No. 8818SC1087) Book Reviews 2024

Court of Appeals of North Carolina No. 8818SC1087 - Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc. Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc. by Court of Appeals of North Carolina No. 8818SC1087 book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Mcelveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Association Inc.!