State v. Brown Book Reviews

State v. Brown by Supreme Court of New Jersey Book Summary

Argued November 14, 2006 In this case, the Appellate Division held that defendant's right to remain silent was not violated when the prosecutor questioned defendant about his pre-arrest silence. Following a violent physical altercation with another man, defendant fled. He was arrested ten months later and charged with assault, robbery, and weapons offenses. At his trial, defendant claimed he was not the aggressor, but merely defended himself when the other man pulled out a knife. The State cross-examined defendant on his pre-arrest conduct in order to challenge defendant's self-defense testimony. The jury found defendant guilty and the Appellate Division affirmed. We now affirm. We hold that when there is no governmental compulsion involved, the State may fairly cross-examine the defendant concerning pre-arrest conduct or silence to challenge his self-defense testimony. We also conclude that the trial court should give a jury instruction that limits the use of that evidence in assessing a defendant's credibility. I.

👋 Do you love State v. Brown books? Please share your friends!

State v. Brown (Supreme Court of New Jersey) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of New Jersey - State v. Brown Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about State v. Brown by Supreme Court of New Jersey book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about State v. Brown!