Reseña de Gregory v. Helvering

Gregory v. Helvering de Supreme Court of the United States Resumen del Libro

Petitioner in 1928 was the owner of all the stock of United Mortgage Corporation. That corporation held among its assets 1,000 shares of the Monitor Securities Corporation. For the sole purpose of procuring a transfer of these shares to herself in order to sell them for her individual profit, and, at the same time, diminish the amount of income tax which would result from a direct transfer by way of dividend, she sought to bring about a "reorganization" under ? 112 (g) of the Revenue Act of 1928, c. 852, 45 Stat. 791, 818, set forth later in this opinion. To that end, she caused the Averill Corporation to be organized under the laws of Delaware on September 18, 1928. Three days later, the United Mortgage Corporation transferred to the Averill Corporation the 1,000 shares of Monitor stock, for which all the shares of the Averill Corporation were issued to the petitioner. On September 24, the Averill Corporation was dissolved, and liquidated by distributing all its assets, namely, the Monitor shares, to the petitioner. No other business was ever transacted, or intended to be transacted, by that company. Petitioner immediately sold the Monitor shares for $133,333.33. She returned for taxation as capital net gain the sum of $76,007.88, based upon an apportioned cost of $57,325.45. Further details are unnecessary. It is not disputed that if the interposition of the so-called reorganization was ineffective, petitioner became liable for a much larger tax as a result of the transaction.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Gregory v. Helvering? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Gregory v. Helvering (Supreme Court of the United States) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Gregory v. Helvering, libro de Supreme Court of the United States

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Gregory v. Helvering de Supreme Court of the United States? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Gregory v. Helvering!