The Supreme Court Of Texas Popular Books

The Supreme Court Of Texas Biography & Facts

The Supreme Court of Texas is the court of last resort for civil matters (including juvenile delinquency cases, which are categorized as civil under the Texas Family Code) in the U.S. state of Texas. A different court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, is the court of last resort in criminal matters. The Court has its seat at the Supreme Court Building on the State Capitol grounds in Austin, Texas. The Texas Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and eight justices. All nine positions are elected, with a term of office of six years and no term limit. The Texas Supreme Court was established in 1846 to replace the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas. It meets in downtown Austin, Texas in an office building near the Texas State Capitol. Regulation of the practice of law in Texas courts By statute, the Texas Supreme Court has administrative control over the State Bar of Texas, an agency of the judiciary. The Texas Supreme Court has the sole authority to license attorneys in Texas. It also appoints the members of the Board of Law Examiners which, under instructions of the Supreme Court, administers the Texas bar exam. The Court has the last word in attorney disciplinary proceedings brought by the Commission for Lawyer Discipline, a committee of the State Bar of Texas, but rarely exercises discretionary review in such cases. The Supreme Court accepts fewer than 100 cases per year to be decided on the merits. In addition to its adjudicatory and administrative functions, the Supreme Court promulgates, and occasionally revises, court rules of procedure, which include the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TRCP), the Texas Rules of Evidence (TRE), and the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure (TRAP).[1] Unique procedural aspects The Texas Supreme Court is the only state supreme court in the United States in which the manner in which it denies discretionary review can actually imply approval or disapproval of the merits of the lower court's decision and in turn may affect the geographic extent of the precedential effect of that decision. In March 1927, the Texas Legislature enacted a law directing the Texas Supreme Court to summarily refuse to hear applications for writs of error when it believed the Court of Appeals opinion correctly stated the law. Thus, since June 1927, over 4,100 decisions of the Texas Courts of Appeals have become valid binding precedent of the Texas Supreme Court itself because the high court refused applications for writ of error rather than denying them and thereby signaled that it approved of their holdings as the law of the state. While Texas's unique practice saved the state supreme court from having to hear relatively minor cases just to create uniform statewide precedents on those issues, it also makes for lengthy citations to the opinions of the Courts of Appeals, since the subsequent writ history of the case must always be noted (e.g., no writ, writ refused, writ denied, etc.) in order for the reader to determine at a glance whether the cited opinion is binding precedent only in the district of the Court of Appeals in which it was decided, or binding precedent for the entire state. Citations to cases from the Houston-based Courts of Appeals are also longer than others because they require identification of the appellate district number -- [1st Dist.] or [14th Dist.] -- in addition to the name of the city. Structure of the court and membership The Texas Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and eight justices. All positions are elective. While the chief has special administrative responsibilities, each member has one vote and may issue a dissenting or concurring opinion. Granted cases are assigned to justices' chambers for opinion authorship by draw. Grants require four votes. Judgments are rendered by majority vote. Per curiam opinions may be issued if at least six justices agree. Petitions for review are automatically denied after 30 days unless at least one justice pulls them off the metaphorical conveyor belt. To serve on the court, a candidate must be at least 35 years of age, a citizen of Texas, licensed to practice law in Texas, and must have practiced law (or have been a lawyer and a judge of a court of record together) for at least ten years. The Clerk of the Court, currently Blake A. Hawthorne, is appointed by the justices and serves a four-year term, which is renewable. All members of the Texas Supreme Court typically belong to the same party because all are elected in statewide races, rather than by the electorates of smaller appellate districts, as the justices on the intermediate appellate courts are. Although there are fourteen such courts, the state is geographically divided into thirteen. Two appellate courts (the 1st and the 14th, sitting in Houston) serve coextensive districts covering ten counties, including Harris County. Recent proposals to reorganize the Texas appellate court system by consolidating districts, and creating a specialty court of appeals for government-entity cases, failed in the Texas legislature's 2021 regular session. Judicial selection: appointments and elections All members of the court are elected to six-year terms in statewide partisan elections. Because their terms are staggered, only some of the justices are up for re-election in any one election cycle. When a vacancy arises, the Governor of Texas appoints a replacement, subject to Senate confirmation, to serve out the unexpired term until December 31 after the next general election. The initial term of tenure is therefore often less than six years. Most of the current justices were originally appointed either by former Governor Rick Perry or by the current Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, who is himself a former member of the court. Like the judges on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, all members of the Texas Supreme Court are currently Republicans. The most recent appointees are Evan Young, Rebeca Huddle, Jane Bland, Jimmy Blacklock, and Brett Busby. Prior public service of incumbents Brett Busby and Jane Bland are former Court of Appeals justices from Houston, whose re-election bids failed in November 2018 when Democrats won all of the judicial races in that election. Blacklock previously served Governor Greg Abbott as general counsel. Huddle was a justice on the First Court of Appeals in Houston. Blacklock replaced Don Willett, who now sits on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the federal appellate court that hears appeals from federal district courts in Texas. Busby succeeds Phil Johnson, who retired in 2018, and was sworn in on  March 20, 2019. Jane Bland was appointed in September 2019 to fill the vacancy left by Jeff Brown, who resigned from the court to accept appointment to a U.S. district court bench. Rebeca Huddle was appointed in October 2020 to replace Paul Green, who retired from the Court on August 31, 2020. Eva Guzman, the second-most senior member of the Court at the time, resigned on June 11, 2021. She is curre.... Discover the The Supreme Court Of Texas popular books. Find the top 100 most popular The Supreme Court Of Texas books.

Best Seller The Supreme Court Of Texas Books of 2024

  • Thomas H. Crofts v. Court Civil Appeals for Eighth Supreme Judicial District Texas Et Al. synopsis, comments

    Thomas H. Crofts v. Court Civil Appeals for Eighth Supreme Judicial District Texas Et Al.

    Panel No. 1. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

    This is an original suit for writ of mandamus brought by relators Thomas H. Crofts, District Judge of Van Zandt County, Texas, 86th Judicial District, and Ancel M. Autry, W. N. Aut...

  • Life and Law synopsis, comments

    Life and Law

    Anthony Kennedy

    From one of America’s most influential judges comes an inside account of thirty years on the Supreme Court and major cases on abortion, affirmative action, freedom of speech, gay m...

  • Crain V. Unauthorized Practice Of Law Committee Of The Supreme Court Of Texas synopsis, comments

    Crain V. Unauthorized Practice Of Law Committee Of The Supreme Court Of Texas

    Texas Court of Appeals

    Trial Judge: John Donovan Trial Court Reporter: Art Zapata Trial Court: 61ST DISTRICT COURT Trial County: HARRIS

  • True Faith and Allegiance synopsis, comments

    True Faith and Allegiance

    Alberto R. Gonzales

    True Faith and Allegiance is the highlyanticipated personal history from Alberto R. Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States and former Counsel to the Presidentthe on...

  • George W. Strake v. Court Appeals for First Supreme Judicial District Texas synopsis, comments

    George W. Strake v. Court Appeals for First Supreme Judicial District Texas

    Supreme Court of Texas

    Relator George W. Strake, Jr., Chairman of the State Republican Executive Committee refused to accept the application of Senator J. E. "Buster" Brown as a candidate in the 1986 Rep...

  • Hon. Bob Perkins v. Court Appeals for Third Supreme Judicial District Texas synopsis, comments

    Hon. Bob Perkins v. Court Appeals for Third Supreme Judicial District Texas

    Second District, Fort Worth Court of Appeals of Texas

    Given what occurred in this cause, the old adage that "Sometimes Justice Can Be Too Swift for the Great State of Texas" might be applicable to what happened in this cause. Another ...

  • Life and Law synopsis, comments

    Life and Law

    Anthony Kennedy

    Anthony Kennedy’s journey from an idyllic youth in 1940s Sacramento to service on the highest courts in America.Anthony Kennedy did not take the usual path to a seat on the Supreme...

  • The Texas Supreme Court synopsis, comments

    The Texas Supreme Court

    James L. Haley

    “Few people realize that in the area of law, Texas began its American journey far ahead of most of the rest of the country, far more enlightened on such subjects as women’s rights ...

  • The Turnaway Study synopsis, comments

    The Turnaway Study

    Diana Greene Foster

    “If you read only one book about democracy, The Turnaway Study should be it. Why? Because without the power to make decisions about our own bodies, there is no democracy.” Gloria S...

  • Make Trouble synopsis, comments

    Make Trouble

    Cecile Richards & Lauren Peterson

    From Cecile Richards, the former president of Planned Parenthood for more than a decade, daughter of the late Ann Richards, featured speaker at the Women’s March on Washington, and...

  • Free to Learn synopsis, comments

    Free to Learn

    Cynthia Levinson

    From the author of the awardwinning The Youngest Marcher comes a picture book about the true story of Alfredo Lopez, an undocumented boy involved in a landmark Supreme Court case t...

  • The Supermajority synopsis, comments

    The Supermajority

    Michael Waldman

    A “terrific, if chilling, account” (The Guardian) of how the Supreme Court’s new conservative supermajority is overturning decades of law and leading the country in a dangerous pol...

  • Honorable Charles Dickens v. Court Appeals for Second Supreme Judicial District Texas synopsis, comments

    Honorable Charles Dickens v. Court Appeals for Second Supreme Judicial District Texas

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

    This is an original mandamus proceeding brought by the Judge of the 297th District Court in Tarrant County (relator), to contest the issuance, by the Court of Appeals for the Secon...

  • The Fourth Durango synopsis, comments

    The Fourth Durango

    Ross Thomas

    The Fourth Durango is not your ordinary Durango. It's not in Spain, or Mexico, and it's not a ski town in the Colorado Rockies, although Durangos do exist in all of those places. ...