Johnson V. U.S. Book Reviews

Johnson V. U.S. by District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Book Summary

The issues presented by this case lead us to reexamine the law of this jurisdiction concerning the admission of evidence of crimes other than the crime with which a defendant is charged. Having done so, we reaffirm the longstanding principle set forth in Drew v. United States *fn1 that evidence of another crime is inadmissible to prove disposition to commit the crime charged. At the same time, we continue to recognize that the inadmissibility of such evidence of other crimes may be overcome if it is offered on and determined to be relevant to a material issue in the case. We also reaffirm that the Drew rule has application only to evidence of another crime that is independent of the crime charged, and that it does not apply to evidence of acts, including criminal conduct, that directly proves the crime charged. We will follow the policy set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403 that evidence, although relevant and otherwise admissible, may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, and will apply that policy not only to admission of evidence generally, but also to the decision whether or not to admit evidence of other crimes that qualifies for admission under the exceptions to the Drew rule.

👋 Do you love Johnson V. U.S. books? Please share your friends!

Johnson V. U.S. (District of Columbia Court of Appeals.) Book Reviews 2024

District of Columbia Court of Appeals. - Johnson V. U.S. Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Johnson V. U.S. by District of Columbia Court of Appeals. book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Johnson V. U.S.!