Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette Book Reviews

Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette by Supreme Court of Florida Book Summary

By petition for certiorari we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Touchette v. Bould, 324 So.2d 707) which allegedly conflicts with decisions of this Court and the District Courts of Appeal on the same point of law. The District Court held that punitive damages must bear some reasonable, albeit imprecise, relation to the actual, or compensatory, damages, citing International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 675 v. Lassitter, 325 So.2d 408 (Fla.4th DCA 1975). We accepted jurisdiction of Lassitter as being in conflict with Levine v. Knowles, 197 So.2d 329 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), and Hutchinson v. Lott, 110 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). We have jurisdiction. Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

👋 Do you love Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette books? Please share your friends!

Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette (Supreme Court of Florida) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Florida - Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette by Supreme Court of Florida book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Dorothy Bould and Edward Simonson v. Mitchell C. Touchette!